RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1601

Oops - I guess I need to give a technical reason for my no vote on 1601.
The version under review is dependent on 1549. I had reviewed that the
latest feedback from the champion's had been incorporated, thinking that
it had been made independent of 1549 before the last review. Sorry about
that!

lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Lisa
Piper
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:04 PM
To: Thomas.Thatcher@sun.com; john.havlicek@freescale.com
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1601

Hi Tom,

I'll vote no on 1601 to stop the vote.  I need to take another look at
which is the latest version.

lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Thomas Thatcher
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:54 PM
To: john.havlicek@freescale.com
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ac] call to vote on 1601

Hi John,

I have a couple of questions about 1601:  The proposal we're voting on
is
dated 9/4/2007, but there was an e-mail thread on 9/9/2007 about a new
revision that was aligned with 1549  (1601_then_1549.pdf).
Were these changes abandonded?

What is the difference between the 9/4/2007 version and the 8/23/2007
version
that we balloted?

Thanks,

Tom

John Havlicek wrote On 09/25/07 02:17 PM,:
> Hi Folks:
> 
> This is the call to vote on the revised proposal for 1601.
> The document on Mantis is 1601_090407.pdf.
> 
> Please vote if you are eligible.  See the details below.
> 
> J.H.
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
> 
> Ballot on Mantis 1601
> 
> - Called on 2007-09-25, final ballots due by 2007-10-02 T 23:59-07:00.
> 
> 
>  v[xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xx] Doron Bustan (Intel)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-x] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys)     
>  n[---------x-xxx---------x-x-xxx-x---x] Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys)
>  v[xx-xxxxxxxxx-xx-xxxxx-xxx-xxx-------] Yaniv Fais (Freescale)
>  t[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] John Havlicek (Freescale -
Chair)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel -
Co-Chair)
>  v[xx-xxx-x--xx--xxxxx----------xx-xxxx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor
Graphics)
>  n[-----------------xxxxx-------x-xx-x-] Jiang Long (Mentor Graphics)
>  n[---------x--xxx.....................] Joseph Lu (Altera)
>  v[xxxxxx..............................] Johan Martensson (Jasper)
>  n[--------------x--x-xx--xx-xxxxxxx-x-] Hillel Miller (Freescale)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx] Lisa Piper (Cadence)
>  v[-xxxxxxx-x-xxxxx-x..................] Erik Seligman (Intel)
>  v[-x--------xxxx-----xxxx-xx----------] Tej Singh (Mentor Graphics)
> yv[xx--xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys)
>  v[xxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx...............] Tom Thatcher (Sun
Microsystems)
>    |------------------------------------ attendance on 2007-09-25
>  |-------------------------------------- voting eligibility for this
ballot
> |--------------------------------------- email ballots received
> 
> 
> 	Legend:
> 		x = attended
> 		- = missed
> 		r = represented
> 		. = not yet a member
> 		v = valid voter (2 out of last 3)
> 		n = not valid voter
>                 t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie
> 

-- 
------------------
Thomas J. Thatcher
Sun Microsystems
408-616-5589
------------------

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.