Lisa-the intention was not that checkers have to be defined in a module. They may be declared within a module, or outside a module. In an OVL-like library, the checkers would be defined as standalone objects. Dmitry-maybe we should state this more explicitly? ________________________________ I could use some more up front information on the use model. I thought this was to be similar to OVL but get around the issues that result from having it conform to a module definition. But if it has to be defined in a module, then how is it used as a general library element? If I define the checker in module a, then how do I reference it from module b? I feel like I'm missing something important. lisa -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Sep 22 19:39:37 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 22 2007 - 19:40:21 PDT