Just to remove any doubts: The general rule is that it is illegal to declare the same identifier twice in the same scope. So this example would be illegal. (6.5 says, "Within a name space (see 3.11), it shall be illegal to redeclare a name already declared by a net, variable or other declaration.") Shalom > What happens when you have both a > let a= ... > and a > reg a = 1'b0; > ? > Is there a separate name space for let declarations? > > [Korchemny, Dmitry] The explanation about identifier > uniqueness was present in the original version of the > proposal. But I received a comment from Shalom that the > universal SV rules should not be duplicated, and therefore I > removed the explanation. Note that the similar situation > takes place with sequences and properties, but there is no > special explanation about them in the LRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Sep 20 07:06:56 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 20 2007 - 07:07:02 PDT