RE: [sv-ac] 2005

From: Bustan, Doron <doron.bustan_at_.....>
Date: Mon Sep 17 2007 - 22:59:46 PDT
I would not change the function, but  for every function call that is
not in a procedural block (like "assign a = test_1(b);", 

I will refer to it as "always_comb a = test_1(b);"

 

Doron

 

________________________________

From: Seligman, Erik 
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 8:29 PM
To: Bustan, Doron; Korchemny, Dmitry; 'sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org'
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 2005

 

>I was thinking of putting the assignments without clocking event
including assignment to  functions inside always_comb and not the other
way around

 

I don't quite understand.  How would the function below be rewritten?

 

function bit test_1(bit x, y);

   test_1  = (x == y);

  a1: assert property (x == y);

endfunction


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Sep 17 23:28:30 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 17 2007 - 23:28:50 PDT