I would not change the function, but for every function call that is not in a procedural block (like "assign a = test_1(b);", I will refer to it as "always_comb a = test_1(b);" Doron ________________________________ From: Seligman, Erik Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 8:29 PM To: Bustan, Doron; Korchemny, Dmitry; 'sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org' Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 2005 >I was thinking of putting the assignments without clocking event including assignment to functions inside always_comb and not the other way around I don't quite understand. How would the function below be rewritten? function bit test_1(bit x, y); test_1 = (x == y); a1: assert property (x == y); endfunction -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Sep 17 23:28:30 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 17 2007 - 23:28:50 PDT