Hello, I have been looking into the possibility to travel, however, there are just too many other things. I could connect through webex / telephone some of the time, the preferred dates would be 9/26-9/27. 10/2-10/3 would also work, but is already more full. Best regards, ed > -----Original Message----- > From: Seligman, Erik [mailto:erik.seligman@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 10:17 AM > To: john.havlicek@freescale.com > Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org; Bustan, Doron; > eduard.cerny@synopsys.COM; yaniv.fais@freescale.com; > Korchemny, Dmitry; Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com; > johan.martensson@jasper-da.com; piper@cadence.com; > bassam.tabbara@synopsys.COM; thomas.thatcher@sun.com; > R53776@freescale.com > Subject: RE: Proposal: 2-day "Mantis Marathon" face-to-face > > > Austin should work for me. Dmitry, I assume from your > distance, Austin > is just as good as SC. > > How about the rest of you? I haven't seen many replies to yesterday's > email. If we want this to happen we should get things > moving. The more > of us that can attend in person, the more effective it will be. > > (BTW-- John-- is someone investigating the reflector problems?) > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:46 AM > To: Seligman, Erik > Cc: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@eda-stds.org; Bustan, Doron; > eduard.cerny@synopsys.com; yaniv.fais@freescale.com; > Korchemny, Dmitry; > Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com; johan.martensson@jasper-da.com; > piper@cadence.com; bassam.tabbara@synopsys.com; > thomas.thatcher@sun.com; > R53776@freescale.com > Subject: Re: Proposal: 2-day "Mantis Marathon" face-to-face > > Hi Erik: > > After having slept on this, I woke up thinking it is a good > idea to try > to make a face-to-face work. > > However, I will not be able to attend in person unless the > meeting is in > Austin. So I am interested to hear whether people can attend > a meeting > in Austin near the transition from September to October. > > Wherever the meeting is held, there should be accommodation of remote > participants, at least through a conference call. Possibly some > web-based multimedia sharing could be done. > > There will need to be a quorum of participants in order to vote on > proposals. If a quorum of participants cannot be raised, then the > meeting could still serve to accelerate revision and convergence on > proposals. > > J.H. > > > X-ExtLoop1: 1 > > X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.20,215,1186383600"; > > d="scan'208";a="273229504" > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 > > Content-class: urn:content-classes:message > > Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:13:51 -0700 > > X-MS-Has-Attach: > > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > > Thread-Topic: Proposal: 2-day "Mantis Marathon" face-to-face > > thread-index: AcfwfPnmBYODijRsSWW2z1ZGejg4HgAEdnQg > > X-Priority: 1 > > Importance: high > > X-Message-Flag: Follow up > > From: "Seligman, Erik" <erik.seligman@intel.com> > > Cc: "Bustan, Doron" <doron.bustan@intel.com>, > <eduard.cerny@synopsys.com>, > > <yaniv.fais@freescale.com>, > > "Korchemny, Dmitry" <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>, > > <Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com>, > <johan.martensson@jasper-da.com>, > > <piper@cadence.com>, <bassam.tabbara@synopsys.com>, > > <thomas.thatcher@sun.com> > > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2007 14:13:52.0260 (UTC) > > FILETIME=[26F07C40:01C7F090] > > > > =20 > > > > Hi all-- > > > > Dmitry & I were chatting, and we are both worried about getting all > > the current proposals into the standard in our time frame, > given the > > long SVAC-Champions-SVAC revision loop, the upcoming Jewish > holidays > > affecting various committee members, and the fact that we > barely get > > through half our agenda in most meetings. > > > > One idea used by some of the other committees has been to > hold a 2-day > > > face-to-face session. We would all be sitting in a single > conference > > room, looking at the same proposals on the screen, and we > could try to > > > complete edits & approve by voice vote as many items as possible. > > > > Dmitry is willing to travel all the way from Israel for > this, so the > > rest of us wimps have no excuse for refusing! > > > > Ideally, it would be best if this happens before the 10/4 IEEE > meeting. > > But it probably needs to happen after the holidays. Some possible > > dates Dmitry & I have discussed are 9/26-9/27, or 10/2-10/3. > > Location-wise, I was thinking the Bay area (Santa Clara/San Jose) > > might be easiest for a bunch of us to get to, though I don't have a > > good sense of our geo distribution. > > > > John, does this sound doable? What do the rest of you think? > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Sep 11 08:30:24 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 11 2007 - 08:30:44 PDT