Hi John, I took an action item to review the clock flow. * The semantics for @(c1)<next>Q is that Q is being evaluated staring from the second accordance of c1. In particular, if c1 occurs at the current time, then Q is being evaluated in the strictly next time that c1 occurs. I think that it makes sense because the first occurrence of c1 is where the evaluation of <next>Q starts * The semantics of @(c1) (Q1 <until> Q2) is there should be an occurrence of c1 where Q2 holds, and in every occurrence of c1 before that, Q1 holds. That also makes sense to me Doron -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Aug 28 22:36:55 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 28 2007 - 22:37:15 PDT