Re: [sv-ac] resend revised 1591

Hi Ed:

No.  1591 should not include stuff from 1677.  Rather, 1677 should
be made to align with the updates from 1591.  1677 should show the
more liberal syntax with extra brackets when it introduces $changed.

J.H.

> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:48:57 -0700
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] resend revised 1591
> Thread-Index: Acfk2lU5CT3JeHEbSaWGBU3eKqa/1QAAcy7Q
> From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2007 16:48:59.0232 (UTC) FILETIME=[56217600:01C7E4DC]
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> I revote yes.
> 
> ed
> 
> 
> PS since 1677 ($changed) has been sent to the working group already,
> should this proposal already  include $changed ?=20
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On=20
> > Behalf Of John Havlicek
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:33 PM
> > To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> > Subject: [sv-ac] resend revised 1591
> >=20
> > Hi Folks:
> >=20
> > Bassam informed me that the previous mail with the second 1591=20
> > proposal had a corrupt attachment.
> >=20
> > I've tried again to attach here.
> >=20
> > This adds the brackets for the $stable, etc. in addition
> > to $past.
> >=20
> > J.H.
> >=20
> > --=20
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >=20
> >=20

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.