Hi John, I think that you should be able to prove the expected semantics of your property using the new flow rules. I don't think it is a matter of hinting. [DB} I don't see how. The flow rules are use to determine the domain of the context not the values of the local variables. So I agree that the property is legal, but I am not sure what its semantics is. You should also consider this example, which is legal today: sequence r; logic v; (1, v = 1) ##1 (v == 1); endsequence property p; logic v; (1,v = 0) ##1 r ##1 (v ==0); Endproperty [DB] The rewrite algorithm makes the names unique, so again it is only a hint. Doron -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Aug 19 22:22:53 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 19 2007 - 22:23:14 PDT