RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1361

The updated proposal is on mantis and attached here.

Thanks.
Manisha

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 6:42 PM
To: john.havlicek@freescale.com
Cc: shalom.bresticker@intel.com; sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1361

OK, I'll update the proposal and send an email soon.

Manisha

-----Original Message-----
From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 5:31 PM
To: Kulshrestha, Manisha
Cc: shalom.bresticker@intel.com; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1361

Hi Manisha:

Let's treat this as a friendly amendment to change the text both in
19.10 and 19.11 so that the two paragraphs are as identical as
possible and they represent the ideas from the perspective of the
merged LRM.

If you can update the proposal quickly, that will be good.

J.H.

> X-ExtLoop1: 1
> X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,579,1175497200"; 
>    d="scan'208";a="254490447"
> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:11:51 +0300
> X-MS-Has-Attach: 
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1361
> Thread-Index:
AcfOU8jbbmaQvq1dRbWdZ0SzKR2FOwAOLxNAAAJg6HAAADXm0AAACZFQAAARGVAAASA5MA==
> From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2007 09:11:51.0787 (UTC)
FILETIME=[D6887BB0:01C7CE9B]
> 
> You can do it in the same Mantis.
> 
> Shalom=20
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kulshrestha, Manisha
[mailto:Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com]=20
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:01 PM
> > To: Bresticker, Shalom; john.havlicek@freescale.com;=20
> > sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1361
> >=20
> > Since the cross-reference in 19.10 has been created by the=20
> > editor of draft3a. We can ask the editor to make it more=20
> > precise (20.7.1.2 instead of 20.7). Or do we need another=20
> > mantis for this ?
> >=20
> > Manisha
> >=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:08 PM
> > To: Bresticker, Shalom; Kulshrestha, Manisha;=20
> > john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1361
> >=20
> > But both sections should use the more precise cross-reference=20
> > that appears in the 1361 proposal.
> >=20
> > Shalom =20
> >=20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bresticker, Shalom
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:37 AM
> > > To: 'Kulshrestha, Manisha'; john.havlicek@freescale.com;=20
> > > sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> > > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1361
> > >=20
> > > When I wrote "consistent", I meant "same". I agree that the
meaning=20
> > > was already the same.
> > >=20
> > > Thanks,
> > > Shalom
> > >=20
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kulshrestha, Manisha
[mailto:Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:35 AM
> > > > To: Bresticker, Shalom; john.havlicek@freescale.com;=20
> > > > sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> > > > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1361
> > > >=20
> > > > Hi shalom,
> > > >=20
> > > > The wording in the 19.10 is already consistent with it in
> > > draft3a. So,
> > > > I'll make the wording same as 19.10 in this new section.
> > > >=20
> > > > Manisha
> > > >=20
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org
> > > > [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of=20
> > Bresticker, Shalom
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:54 PM
> > > > To: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> > > > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] call to vote on Mantis 1361
> > > >=20
> > > > If this is going to be the wording in a new 19.11, the
> > > wording of the
> > > > corresponding paragraph in 19.10 should be consistent with it.
> > > >=20
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Shalom
> > > > =20
> > > >=20
> > > > > - Change
> > > > >=20
> > > > >      When the system task is specified with arguments, the
first
> > > > >      argument indicates levels of the hierarchy,
> > > consistent with the
> > > > >      corresponding argument to the Verilog $dumpvars system
> > > > >      task. Subsequent arguments specify which scopes of
> > > the model to
> > > > >      control. These arguments can specify entire scopes
(module,
> > > > >      program, interface, always block or initial block) or
> > > > individual
> > > > >      assertions. Please refer to 20.7.1.2 for the definition
of
> > > > >      $dumpvars.
> > > > >=20
> > > > >   to
> > > > >=20
> > > > >      When the system task is specified with arguments, the
first
> > > > >      argument indicates levels of the hierarchy,
> > > consistent with the
> > > > >      corresponding argument to the $dumpvars system task (see
> > > > >      20.7.1.2). Subsequent arguments specify which scopes
> > > > of the model
> > > > >      to control. These arguments can specify entire
> > > scopes (module,
> > > > >      program, interface, always block or initial block) or
> > > > individual
> > > > >      assertions.
> > > >=20
> > > > --
> > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous=20
> > content by=20
> > > > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> > > >=20
> >=20

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.