Re: [sv-ac] 1722 and 1855 combined proposal

Hi Neil:

My understanding of Brad Pierce's comments was that he 
recommended 1722 be "sent down", as it were, and the 
fixes for 1855 combined with it.

There were also some minor changes recommended for the
existing text of 1722.

There is one issue in 1855 that overlaps with 1850, and
SV-AC will not address that.

So, I think 1722 should be re-opened and removed from the 
champions agenda until the revised proposal is re-voted.
Also, when the revised proposal for 1722 is passed, I 
think 1855 should be closed due to subsumption.

J.H.


> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:02:00 -0700
> From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM>
> Sender: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM
> Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Reply-to: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jul 2007 00:02:27.0423 (UTC) FILETIME=[17C336F0:01C7C998]
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> Can you offer an explanation on what the plan is for these mantis items?
> 
> Mantis 1722 is currently on the agenda for the upcoming Champions meeting.
> It is also in the resolved state. This email seems to indicate that the
> proposal for 1722 should be removed from the agenda for the Champions
> meeting. Once the Champions approve a proposal it then goes on to the
> P1800 and then the editor.
> 
> Mantis 1722 could be closed if it is being subsumed by another mantis
> item. Let me know how you want us to proceed on this.
> 
> 
> Neil
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Lisa Piper wrote On 07/18/07 10:02,:
> >  <<1722-bind_clarifications_draft3a.pdf>>
> > 
> > Attached is the combined 1722 and 1855 proposal. This will need a
> > re-vote since additional changes were done.
> > 
> > Lisa
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.