RE: [sv-ac] notes on 1648

From: Eduard Cerny <Eduard.Cerny_at_.....>
Date: Tue Jun 12 2007 - 05:55:16 PDT
Hello John,

will correct the first one. regarding the 2nd issue, the topic is not
discussed there, even thought the structure of the always is meant to be
synthesizable. I will simply delete that note which probably is
redundant anyway.

Best...
ed 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:43 PM
> To: Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.COM
> Cc: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ac] notes on 1648
> 
> Hi Ed:
> 
> I noticed one typo (maybe it was mine):  Change
> 
>    does not depend on the position of the declaration item with the
> 
> to 
> 
>    does not depend on the position of the declaration item within the
> 
> I'm still concerned about the statement on the inferred enabling
> condition for two-state tools.  To my knowledge, this topic is not
> discussed in the general presentation of inferred enabling conditions.
> Am I wrong?  If not, it should be discussed there too.
> 
> J.H.
> 
> > X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> > Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> > Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:35:14 -0700
> > X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
> > Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] notes on 1648
> > Thread-Index: AcesUdkJCmR/KCX5Qwe1KIsOn+J0HgAHmuBg
> > From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com>
> > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2007 21:35:16.0647 (UTC) 
> FILETIME=[66ECFB70:01C7AC70]
> > 
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > 
> > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7AC70.6674937E
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > 	charset="us-ascii"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > 
> > Hello John et al,
> > 
> > please find attached a modified proposal based on John's
> > recommendations. Let me know if it is acceptable. I also 
> uploaded that
> > to Mantis and deleted the old proposals.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > ed=20
> > 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Jun 12 05:55:33 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 12 2007 - 05:55:59 PDT