Hi Ed, We also need to update (see "assume" and add similar entry): 36.42, 36.43, 38.3.2, A.2.10. Thx. -Bassam. -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Eduard Cerny Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:32 AM To: Brad Pierce Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Mantis and proposal for restrict property verification statement Thanks. I added a note to add restrict to table B1 and corrected the other two items. Uploaded. ed > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of > Brad Pierce > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 12:16 PM > To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org > Subject: Re: [sv-ac] Mantis and proposal for restrict property > verification statement > > Please see, regarding new keywords, > > http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-ac/hm/3900.html > > Also, in the change for Annex A.2.10 -- > > 1) "expect_property_statement" shouldn't be added to > "concurrent_assertion_statement". > > > 2) The second "assume_property_statement" should be > "restrict_property_statement". > > -- Brad > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of > Eduard Cerny > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 8:48 AM > To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org > Subject: [sv-ac] Mantis and proposal for restrict property > verification statement > > Hello, > > I have created a new mantis item #1806 and deposited a proposal. (also > attached) > > Best regards, > ed > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri May 11 09:41:34 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 11 2007 - 09:41:39 PDT