Hi All, Personally I find these expressions clever, but they will be considered "obfuscated" by most readers. I suggest we strive for something obviously correct at first sight to all readers, not just experts. Thanks, Doug > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 7:29 AM > To: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org > Subject: Re: [sv-ac] if..else and 4-state conditions > > >what is the meaning of > > 1'b0 inside {1'bx} > > It's 1'b1. > > The following are the same -- > > 1'b0 inside {b!=0} > 1'b0 ==? (b!=0) > > The ==? propagates unknowns from the left, but treats unknowns on the > right as optimistic don't-care wildcards > > RIGHT > 0 1 x z > > L 0 1 0 1 1 > E 1 0 1 1 1 > F x x x 1 1 > T z x x 1 1 > > -- Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Bromley > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 5:01 AM > To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] if..else and 4-state conditions > > Apologies, I mistakenly sent this response to Brad Pierce instead of > sv-ac at first. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > A simpler way to write that condition is > > > > 1'b0 inside {b!=0} > > Urrrm, what is the meaning of > 1'b0 inside {1'bx} > ? > > Actually, my original suggestion was (almost) > > (b!=0) !== 1'b1 // originally I forgot the 1'b size > > which seems to me to be simpler still; but I > (willingly) conceded that !bit'(b!=0) was neater. > > Surely the point here is that we need two expressions that are > guaranteed to be (a) 2-state, (b) complements; both > bit'() , !bit'() > and > ===1'b1 , !==1'b1 > fit the requirements in a rather obvious way. > -- > Jonathan Bromley, Consultant > > DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how > VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services > > Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 > 1AW, UK > Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: > jonathan.bromley@doulos.com > Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: > http://www.doulos.com > > The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not > the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed May 2 08:02:41 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 02 2007 - 08:02:48 PDT