Hi Ed, I read the 1758 proposal. I cannot tell where the change is in section 8.2. They look the same. My understanding from 17.11 is that it must be a property_expr on both sides of these operators. If so, then the text to insert between 8-1 and Table 8-1 is wrong. It should use not instead of "!" and and/or instead of && and //. But then other places it looks like it can be a sequence expression. Perhaps this is because a sequence expr is a property expr? I'm confused. Lisa -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Apr 8 15:16:18 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 08 2007 - 15:16:36 PDT