[sv-ac] my actions on mantis 1763

All:

I had an action item from our last meeting (see below) to enter a 
bugnote for 1763 and change its state.  I decided to add "additional
information" instead of a bugnote.  People can edit the additional
information.  I wasn't sure if they would be able to edit a 
bugnote.

Bassam and Ed are supposed to review what I entered.

J.H.


- New mantis item 1763.
  . All expressing an opinion thought that the assertion control tasks 
    in the language today should not affect ended, matched, triggered.
  . ES(?): Is there a motivating example?
  . BT: If you had vpicontrol and turned it off, that should turn
    off a sequence, though.  There is more controllability through the VPI.
  . BT: 27.31 talks about controlling assertions.  Assertion covers
    sequence instances, etc.
  . EC: The interesting case is when the sequence is used as an event
    control.  It could be useful to add sequences, etc. as targets of
    the existing assertion control tasks.
  . BT: This will bring alignment between the VPI control and the 
    control from within the language.  
  . JH to move mantis to "assigned to EC" and modify the mantis item 
    to capture the discussion.  JH will ask BT and EC to review.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.