RE: [sv-ac] New mantis item #1769 - elaboration-time assert and error message tasks

Hi Lisa,

You are right, we should not assume "let", I will change the text
accordingly. 

About the names - what do you suggest? 

ed 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lisa Piper [mailto:piper@cadence.com] 
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 9:23 AM
> To: Eduard Cerny
> Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] New mantis item #1769 - elaboration-time 
> assert and error message tasks
> 
> Hi Ed,
> 
> In this proposal, you should not assume the let_declaration 
> exists yet.
> It appears twice in the syntax section. I also think it would 
> be good to
> show the example of 1620.  
> 
> I see compile and elaboration as two distinct steps. This 
> says it is an
> elaboration-time check, but the names of the system tasks tend to
> suggest compile-time ($comp_...).  Why is this?
> 
> Lisa
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Eduard Cerny
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 10:10 AM
> To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] New mantis item #1769 - elaboration-time assert and
> error message tasks
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have created a new mantis item and deposited a proposal for
> elaboration-time assertions and error tasks. Attached here too.
> 
> Best regards,
> ed
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.