> > Sequences and properties are not data types mentioned in Clause 4. Has > this been changed? If not, is it OK to be talking about "sequence data > type"? [DR>] Mantis 1549 introduced these new "types". If you can think of a sequence and property as a type, then there is no need for these system functions as we already have the type() function that lets you compare types in an elaboration context. I'd rather see type equality defined in terms to meet these requirements than introduce more language. Dave -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Apr 4 14:33:30 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 04 2007 - 14:33:34 PDT