Re: [sv-ac] call for email vote on motion regarding Mantis 1728

From: John Havlicek <john.havlicek_at_.....>
Date: Tue Mar 27 2007 - 16:36:43 PDT
Hi Bassam:

> I do vote yes. I suggest we add more wording to motivate why we are
> sending to BC and that is the use in procedural code i.e. other language
> contexts outside of assertions, that's the intent right ?

Yes.  The "let" construct is a generally useful one for 
representing instantiable expressions with arguments.

If this motion passes, then we will have agreement in principle
and it should be easy to get consensus on the additional language 
that you envision.

J.H.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Mar 27 16:37:06 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 27 2007 - 16:37:16 PDT