RE: [sv-ac] uploaded updated proposal for 1361

Manisha, just strike out the "and" before kill, I think it's better if
consolidated in one sentence. 

Thx.
-Bassam.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 11:04 AM
To: john.havlicek@freescale.com
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] uploaded updated proposal for 1361

Hi John,

I'll fix the first two issues. About the last issue, in the last version
of the proposal, I had a separate statement about pass, fail and vacuous
actions ? Could you check that version and see if that looks better.

Thanks.
Manisha 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 5:27 AM
To: Kulshrestha, Manisha
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ac] uploaded updated proposal for 1361

Hi Manisha:

I noticed three minor things, listed below, that I would like tidied up
before we call for the vote and pass this over to SV-CC.

J.H.

- In several places, there are references to "22.19" that I think should
be "22.9".

- In several places, there is text

     Refer to section 17.11.2 and 17.13 for the definition of vacuous
success.

  In view of the changes from 1381 already in P1800-2008-draft1, I think
this
  should be

     Refer to section 17.13.6 for the definition of vacuous success.

- I think the English structure of the sentence

     On disable, enable, reset, and kill, pass action, fail action and
     vacuous action callbacks, the returned p_vpi_attempt_info info
     pointer is NULL, and no attempt information is available.

   at the end is confusing (too poetic?).  Should there be an "and"
before "kill"?


> 
> Hi,
> =20
> I have uploaded an updated version on mantis. This proposal is now 
> ready for vote.
> =20
> Thanks.
> Manisha
> 

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.