SV-AC, Please excuse the intrusion. I've been following the 1737 discussion and wanted to ask a question that will probably expose my ignorance and/or stupidity. When creating "cover property" with an inferred antecedent, ... if (condition) begin cover property (P); ... is rewritten as cover property (not (condition |-> not (P))); I understand and agree with this, but I can't see any difference between cover property (not (condition |-> not (P))); and the easier-to-understand cover property (condition ##0 P); Can someone kindly explain why the double-negation form is preferable? Thanks in advance -- Jonathan Bromley -- This message has been scanned for viruses anddangerous content by MailScanner, and isbelieved to be clean.Received on Thu Mar 22 06:59:48 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 22 2007 - 06:59:57 PDT