Re: [sv-ac] 1466- shortcuts proposal

Hi all,

I have re-reviewed 1466 and didn't find any issues. (except the coloring 
to red of the tokens in the syntax but I guess you can't make these 
purple and red in the same time and that is clear to the editor anyway).

As for Bassams's comments I also don't find these very useful and I can 
type two more characters to make things clearer , I would also not teach 
beginners those as usually they complain that the syntax is complex and 
confusing enough; however the enhancement is pretty simple and advanced 
users may like it or if someone is used to it from PSL then why not.

Thanks,
Yaniv




Bassam Tabbara wrote:
> Thx Lisa,
> In case I did not before, I'd like to voice my reservations about the 
> intent of the syntax sugaring here. "?" which a different meaning in 
> Verilog (yes yes different context, still) made my dislike act up :). 
> What bugs me more is the [*], if a user say made a mistake and dropped 
> a digit from [*2] say, they get a nasty [*0:$] eating up their time.
> Anyway, food for thought, for me the ROI is not there, I'd rather 
> type/see the $'s (pun intended :)!).
> Thx.
> -Bassam.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *Lisa Piper
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:21 PM
> *To:* sv-ac@eda.org
> *Subject:* [sv-ac] 1466- shortcuts proposal
>
> Hi all,
>
> The attached proposal was updated to include a request from Dmitry for 
> a shortcut of “?” for 0 to 1. I have uploaded this to mantis.
>
> Lisa
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, 
> and is
> believed to be clean.
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. *

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.