RE: [sv-ac] Mantis 1648 Review

Hello all,

I have incorporated Tom's recommendations in the new proposal. 
See attached file or on Mantis.

best regards,
ed 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Thomas Thatcher
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:57 PM
> To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] Mantis 1648 Review
> 
> Hello Everyone,
> 
> I have reviewed the proposal for Mantis 1648.
> 
> General comments:  It's a little confusing to read because of the
> change bars between this proposal and the previous proposal.
> 
> Here are a few specific problems.
> 
> 1. Misspelling of "disabling" in the first line.
> 
> 2.  Shouldn't  the module_or_generate_item_declaration syntax be
>     inside a box?
> 
> 3.  Perhaps case a) should be restated as
>     a)  If an assertion has a disable iff clause, then the 
> disable specified
> 	in this clause will be used, and any default disable 
> statement will be
> 	ignored.
> 
> 3. Add reset signal "rst" to the port list of module
>    "examples_without_default"
> 
> Other than these, the proposal looks good.
> 
> Tom
> -- 
> ------------------
> Thomas J. Thatcher
> Sun Microsystems
> 408-616-5589
> ------------------
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.