RE: [sv-ac] feedback on 1730 - prop and seq expression

Hi Surrendra,

I did not mean parenthesis around the sequence match item - I meant
around the whole seq expression.

lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Surrendra Dudani
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 8:41 AM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] feedback on 1730 - prop and seq expression

Hi Lisa,
The sequence match items already require parenthesis, so additional
parenthesis is not necessary.
Surrendra
>Hi Ed,

>Editorial:  In addition to appendix A, these changes need to be made in
Property Syntax >17-14 and Sequence Syntax 17-4 (note that the draft
still has errors - reference the >>feedback from John on Mantis 928).
>Is it the intent that the user should able to provide a sequence match
item?  Can we require >parenthesis around the whole thing to make it
more readable, especially if a sequence match >item is attached. The
comma before the sequence match item may be difficult to distinguish
from an argument separator when positional binding is used.

>Lisa

 


****************************************
Surrendra A. Dudani
Synopsys, Inc.
377 Simarano Drive, Suite 300
Marlboro, MA 01752

Tel:   508-263-8072
Fax:   508-263-8123
email: Surrendra.Dudani@synopsys.com  
**************************************** 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.