Re: [sv-ac] Mantis 1735 Review

Hi Tom:

I think that 1735 has been written assuming that the feedback from our
proofreading of 0928 is implemented by the editor.

You should have a look at the bugnote to 0928 that describes the
editorial changes requested.  0928 is now under SV-LRM, not SV-AC.

I am not saying that all of your points will be addressed, but I think
some of them will.

J.H.


> X-Authentication-Warning: server.eda-stds.org: majordom set sender to owner-sv-ac@eda.org using -f
> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:33:26 -0800
> From: Thomas Thatcher <Thomas.Thatcher@Sun.COM>
> Reply-To: Thomas.Thatcher@Sun.COM
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> X-eda.org-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
> X-Spam-Status: No, No
> Sender: owner-sv-ac@eda.org
> X-eda.org-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
> X-eda.org-MailScanner-From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2007 18:34:11.0977 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1A36790:01C755E6]
> 
> Hello Everyone,
> 
> I have been reviewing Mantis 1735, "Incomplete fixes from 0928."
> 
> Here is what I have found:.
> 
> 1.  From Mantis 0928:  Should the syntax production "sequence_actual_arg"
>     be included in Syntax Box 17-2?
> 
> 2.  The Mantis 1735 proposal calls for a correction of the syntax
>     production "property_port_item" in Syntax Box 17-14, but
>     "property_port_item" does not appear in this syntax box.
>     Note that syntax production "property_port_list" also does not
>     appear in the syntax box.
> 
> 3.  It looks like the editor missed the Mantis 928 change to
>     "property_declaration" in Syntax 17-14.  It still uses "tf_port_list",
>     instead of "property_port_list"  (The production is correct in
>     A.2.10).
> 
> 4.  The Mantis 1735 proposal call for changing the production
>     "sequence_port_item" in Syntax 17-4, but this production does not
>     appear in this box.
> 
> 5.  The definition of "sequence_declaration" in Syntax 17-4 was not updated
>     according to the Mantis 928 proposal.
>     It still uses "tf_port_list".  This box should also include the
>     productions "sequence_port_list", "sequence_port_item", and
>     "sequence_formal_type".
> 
> 6.  Note that the production "sequence_declaration" does not appear in
>     Syntax 17-2.  Never has, apparently.
> 
> Tom
> -- 
> ------------------
> Thomas J. Thatcher
> Sun Microsystems
> 408-616-5589
> ------------------
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.