Hi Lisa, You declare them there to get the clocking and can always assert thru cb's name. THX. -Bassam -----Original Message----- From: Lisa Piper <piper@cadence.com> To: Bassam Tabbara <Bassam.Tabbara@synopsys.COM>; sv-ac@eda-stds.org <sv-ac@eda-stds.org> Sent: Tue Feb 20 20:02:07 2007 Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 1547 review Hi Bassam, I guess I don’t understand the use model. When would you want to define properties and sequences in a clocking block? When would you do this and not want to assert them? Lisa ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bassam Tabbara Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:17 PM To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org Subject: [sv-ac] 1547 review The proposal seems fine but I disagree with what its objective. I believe the clocking block is a declaration scope so it would be quite inadequate to add executing statements into a construct intended to orthogonalize clocking/sampling definition (declaration) from structure/behavior. Putting asserts there is undesirable in my opinion, and would open the door to other statements. Thx. -Bassam. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses anddangerous content by MailScanner, and isbelieved to be clean.Received on Tue Feb 20 20:34:26 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 20 2007 - 20:34:38 PST