RE: [sv-ac] mantis 1727

From: Eduard Cerny <Eduard.Cerny_at_.....>
Date: Tue Feb 06 2007 - 07:20:49 PST
Hi John,

so let's see how it evolves... I am only afraid that it will get stuck
between two committees and not move either way. So I'd say keep 1550 and
if changes are made elsewhere we could adjust then.

ed 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 10:11 AM
> To: Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.COM
> Cc: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@eda-stds.org; 
> sv-bc@eda-stds.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ac] mantis 1727
> 
> Hi Ed:
> 
> My opinion is that we should not be defining the preponed values 
> for the time 0 slot in 17.7.
> 
> If SV-BC think that no change in the LRM is needed, that is fine
> and they can just confirm your interpretation.  If not, then 
> they should do some adjustment in sections 6 and 9 (perhaps elsewhere
> too) to make this clearer where it is defined.
> 
> There is still the option of avoiding any commentary about 
> the preponed values in the time 0 slot in 17.7 and instead
> saying simply that these preponed values are returned/used
> and referencing the parts of the LRM where those are clearly 
> defined.
> 
> J.H.
> 
> > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> > Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> > Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 05:59:20 -0800
> > Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] mantis 1727
> > Thread-Index: AcdJ8kYP8iYi2xj1QwWux3HZEqWqLQABKFwQ
> > From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com>
> > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2007 13:59:21.0321 (UTC) 
> FILETIME=[003EBD90:01C749F7]
> > 
> > Hi John,
> > 
> > isn't the text in the current proposal for #1550 
> sufficient? That was
> > discussed with people on the Sv-BC committee.
> > 
> > ed
> > =20
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On=20
> > > Behalf Of John Havlicek
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 8:24 AM
> > > To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org; sv-bc@eda-stds.org
> > > Subject: [sv-ac] mantis 1727
> > >=20
> > > All:
> > >=20
> > > There has been confusion in SV-AC about what are
> > > the preponed values of various things in the time 0 slot.
> > >=20
> > > I entered mantis 1727 asking for SV-BC to clarify.
> > >=20
> > > J.H.
> > >=20
> > > --=20
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > believed to be clean.
> > >=20
> > >=20
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Feb 6 07:21:15 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 06 2007 - 07:21:23 PST