RE: [sv-ac] mantis 1727

Hi John,

isn't the text in the current proposal for #1550 sufficient? That was
discussed with people on the Sv-BC committee.

ed
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of John Havlicek
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 8:24 AM
> To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org; sv-bc@eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] mantis 1727
> 
> All:
> 
> There has been confusion in SV-AC about what are
> the preponed values of various things in the time 0 slot.
> 
> I entered mantis 1727 asking for SV-BC to clarify.
> 
> J.H.
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.