Hello John, please see below my comments regarding item 1381. Best regards, ed -------- Editing issues: none. Content issue already in the proposal: 17.13.5: It seems to me that the requested correction is not quite right: "Another inference made from the context is the enabling condition for a property. Such derivation takes place when a property is placed in an if..else block or a case block. A concurrent assertion embedded in procedural code specifies that a new evaluation attempt of the underlying property_spec begins at every occurrence of the inferred clocking event." There is a sentence deleted that tried to indicate what the inference consists of. It was not quite correct but it said at least something. The new added sentence does not seem to have any bearing on enabling condition inference. Should it say something along the following lines? "A concurrent assertion embedded in procedural code in an if..else block or a case block specifies that a new evaluation attempt of the underlying property_spec begins at every occurrence of the inferred clocking event provided that the condition leading to the location of the assertion in the block is true." --------- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Feb 2 10:32:58 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 02 2007 - 10:33:14 PST