RE: [sv-ac] reminder to vote on mantis 1550

There's nothing stopping you from writing a proposal with the wording you want, and passing on to another committee to vote on. sv-bc/ec do that all the time.

-Dave

Sent from my Treo700P


-----Original Message-----

From:  "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com>
Subj:  RE: [sv-ac] reminder to vote on mantis 1550
Date:  Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:01 am
Size:  851 bytes
To:  "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com>; "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.COM>; "john.havlicek@freescale.com" <john.havlicek@freescale.com>
cc:  "sv-ac@eda-stds.org" <sv-ac@eda-stds.org>

That's fine. As long as that is done :-) 
ed  
 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Rich, Dave [mailto:Dave_Rich@mentor.com]  
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:51 AM 
> To: Eduard Cerny; john.havlicek@freescale.com 
> Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org 
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] reminder to vote on mantis 1550 
>  
>  
> >  
> > That is not implied and should be added. We could add that  
> in relaten 
> to 
> > $sampled, but it affects sampling in clocking blocks and assertions. 
> So 
> > it should go to SV-BC? But, it may do no harm to repeat that in 1550 
> for 
> > $sampled and the other functions. 
> [DR>] 
>  
> Ed, 
>   
> It's better to have definitions in one place and have other sections 
> reference it. That way when the definitions need updating, we  
> don't scan 
> through all the other sections to update them also. 
>  
> Dave 
>  


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.