Hi John, should I change the proposal along these lines? ed > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On > Behalf Of John Havlicek > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:40 PM > To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org > Subject: Re: [sv-ac] reminder to vote on mantis 1550 > > Hi Ed: > > I think tha what you describe will achieve consistency between > > 1. $sampled returns the preponed value of its argument in the > current time slot (including the time 0 slot). > > and > > 2. What the LRM currently says about preponed values in the > time 0 slot. > > > Hillel has indicated that there are still missing capabilities, > but I'm not sure that these should be addressed by changing > the definition of $sampled. > > J.H. > > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 > > Content-class: urn:content-classes:message > > Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:44:39 -0800 > > Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] reminder to vote on mantis 1550 > > Thread-Index: AcdAIjfrqD0yBNyUSJKs6kNGFbt2agAZnDewAAGZvdA= > > From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com> > > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jan 2007 14:44:40.0972 (UTC) > FILETIME=[58538CC0:01C7408F] > > > > Hi, would it be enough to change the text so that it is the value > > assigned in the declaration of the variable or in the absence the > > default value of type? I view the assigned values in > declarations and > > the default values as the values that the variable has from -oo till > > 0^-. > > > > ed=20 > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On=20 > >> Behalf Of Miller Hillel-R53776 > >> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:24 AM > >> To: Havlicek John-r8aaau; sv-ac@eda-stds.org > >> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] reminder to vote on mantis 1550 > >>=20 > >> John, > >>=20 > >> I am not sure we should make such an inconsistency it sounds=20 > >> troubling. > >>=20 > >> However, the reason why static variable declarartion=20 > >> assignments cannot > >> be used, is that it cannot be used by an outer module > reference. If I > >> want to influence the initial value of a $ function that is=20 > >> dependent on > >> a module's reg, how would this be done. Would I need to=20 > >> rewrite the code > >> with the declaration assignment? > >>=20 > >> Maybe we need an additional construct for initializing the $sampled > >> value of a variable at the same time as assignment declaration. > >>=20 > >> Thanks > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> =20 > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> Hillel Miller> > >>=20 > >>=20 > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jan 25 10:46:03 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 25 2007 - 10:46:12 PST