RE: [sv-ac] comment on 1550

Hello John,

I have modified the text so as to refer only to $sampled - updated in
preponed region. Please see on Mantis (also attached here), perhaps we
could vote now.

ed
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of John Havlicek
> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 11:35 AM
> To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] comment on 1550
> 
> Hi Ed:
> 
> I have not seen any discussion of the proposal for 1550.
> 
> I was supposed to call for a vote last Tuesday, but did not
> since no one had said anything.
> 
> I looked back over 1550 and noticed something that should 
> probably be changed.  You have left in the sentence
> 
>    "The value of the sampled value functions is updated
>    in the postponed scheduling region and can be read
>    in the subsequent time step."
> 
> However, we were supposed to have split the proposal so
> that $past, $rose, $fell, $stable are dealt with in 
> resolving 1698.  Therefore, I don't think we should be
> prescribing in 1550 how _all_ of the sampled value 
> functions update.
> 
> I think you should change this sentence to refer only
> to $sampled.  
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> J.H.
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.