Hello, I have not yet split the item into two, as agreed upon during the last meeting. The reason is that I think that the proposal $past can be changed so that we could resolve it all under 1550. I added the proposal for $past in yet another bug note. It contains the following text: --- The problem with the proposal in the preceding bug note was that if a task contained a reference to $past and it was called from both active and reactive region, the implementation was not unique. I think that this can be corrected as follows: Regardless where $past(x,,,@clk) is called from, the RTL equivalent is always @clk past_variable <= $sampled(x); and executes in the active region. If $past is called from active, reactive or observed regions, replace the call by $sampled(past_variable). In synthesized code which would always execute in the active region, just remove $sampled from any of the calls. Provided that the model follows synthesis rules and is not racy, the behavior should be equivalent to that in the original model using $past. --- If you do not see a problem with this kind of formulation, I would work it into the official proposal. Best regards, edReceived on Fri Dec 15 14:14:45 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 15 2006 - 14:15:05 PST