RE: [sv-ac] Updated proposal for #1550 - $sampled and sampled value functions - cont'd

> 
> Cont'd..
> there is one point though - $past is not a variable and no 
> user-visible event is scheduled. Hence I do not see that 
> updating the function there contradicts the spirit of the 
> statement you mentioned.
> 
> ed
> 
> 
> Hillel, 
> the problem with treating $past as a net is that the value 
> would be seen
> differently in the reactive and the active regions. This is why I
> proposed the postponed region.  Perhaps the pre-postponed region could
> do even though it is meant for callbacks?
> Regards,
> ed
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> > Behalf Of Miller Hillel-R53776
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 4:53 AM
> > To: Eduard Cerny; sv-ac@eda.org
> > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Updated proposal for #1550 - $sampled 
> > and sampled value functions
> > 
> > Ed,
> > 
> > Updating in the postponed region does not meet the spirit behind the
> > requirement below. I would consider $past as an implicit net.
> > 
> > "The Postponed region provides for a PLI callback control point that
> > allows PLI application routines to be
> > suspended until after all the Active, Inactive, NBA, 
> > Observed, Reactive,
> > and Re-inactive regions have completed.
> > Within this region, it is illegal to write values to any net 
> > or variable
> > or to schedule an event in any
> > previous region within the current time slot."
> > Specified on page 123.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > 
> > Hillel Miller>
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> > Eduard Cerny
> > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 10:44 PM
> > To: sv-ac@eda.org
> > Subject: [sv-ac] Updated proposal for #1550 - $sampled and 
> > sampled value
> > functions
> > 
> > I have uploaded a new version of the proposal. It also 
> indicates when
> > the updated function values can be read.
> > 
> > ed
> > 
> > 
>