Re: [sv-ac] Blocking actions in an attached task call

Hi Jonathan,

I think it is a good idea to add clarification to the LRM
text.

J.H.

> X-VirusChecked: Checked
> X-Env-Sender: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com
> X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-139.messagelabs.com!1164657553!657159!1
> X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7; banners=-,-,-
> X-Originating-IP: [80.229.89.154]
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:59:13 -0000
> X-MS-Has-Attach: 
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] Blocking actions in an attached task call
> Thread-Index: AccRi/Jnd7UqdhrURcOQB9VyyrXPQwA0k0eQ
> From: "Jonathan Bromley" <jonathan.bromley@doulos.com>
> Cc: <sv-ac@eda-stds.org>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Nov 2006 19:59:17.0263 (UTC) FILETIME=[8519B9F0:01C7125E]
> 
> John,
> 
> > The intention was that the subroutine attached to a
> > sequence be executed as a separate thread.
> > The assertion evaluation does not wait on or receive=20
> > data back from a subroutine call attached to a sequence.
> 
> thanks for the clarification.  I had not understood that
> from the LRM; would it be a good idea to add a clarification
> to the LRM text, or is it simply that I've been silly and
> missed something?
> 
> --=20
> Jonathan Bromley, Consultant