RE: [sv-ac] mantis 1550

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of John Havlicek
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:47 AM
> To: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ac] mantis 1550
> 
> 
> Also, can we have a statement that update events due to changes in
> sampled value functions are scheduled in the appropriate region of the
> next time slot?  [It is still not clear to me that all these will go
> to the active region -- maybe some will go, e.g., to the reactive
> region.]
>
[DR>] It still can be defined as an active update event. All events
execute as active events. It's just that if the process is "reactive"
scheduled, it won't wake up until that region becomes active. You can
have @(non-reactive_region_variable) inside a reactive region block of
code. The process will be scheduled to wake up as a reactive event.

Dave