Hi, I think that we can vote on it now that it has been modified. I mean on 805. Ed -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org <owner-sv-ac@eda.org> To: Kulshrestha, Manisha <Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com>; sv-ac@eda-stds.org <sv-ac@eda-stds.org> Sent: Tue Sep 19 17:24:24 2006 Subject: RE: [sv-ac] #805 and new mantis #1599 805 looks fine to me. Are we supposed to vote yet? Lisa ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 4:43 PM To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org Subject: [sv-ac] #805 and new mantis #1599 Hi, I have uploaded latest proposal for 805. This proposal does not include changes in assertion API and VPI. Please review it and send your comments if any. I have also created a new mantis item to address assertion API and VPI changes. The number is 1599. Thanks. ManishaReceived on Tue Sep 19 23:14:20 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 19 2006 - 23:14:43 PDT