RE: [sv-ac] RE: minor comments on 1549

From: Lisa Piper <piper_at_.....>
Date: Mon Sep 04 2006 - 17:17:32 PDT
Agreed!  I will make sure to correct that.

 

lisa

 

________________________________

From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:27 AM
To: Lisa Piper; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] RE: minor comments on 1549

 

I suggest changing "parameters" to "arguments", to avoid confusion with
identifiers declared with the parameter keyword.

 

Shalom

 

I don't understand what it means when you say "this is strongly
recommended for all parameters". Since a property is instantiated at
elaboration time, how could the parameters be anything other than
constants? Surely they cannot be depend on procedural code.

[Lisa Piper >>>] The tool would give an error regardless so it is not
required, just recommended to help the user
Received on Mon Sep 4 17:17:40 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 04 2006 - 17:17:55 PDT