Re: [sv-ac] #1532

A sequence is a kind of event?
 
-- Brad

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org] On
Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 12:35 PM
To: Brad Pierce; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] #1532


Hi,
 
This proposal does not break backward compatibility as
@hierarchical_event_identifier takes care of the case 
a = @s c;
 
What this proposal is saying is that if there is a parameterized
sequence instance, it has to be inside '(..)' so that it does not create
any conflicts.
 
Thanks.
Manisha

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
[mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 12:13 PM
To: sv-ac@server.eda-stds.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ac] #1532


The proposed BNF change unnecessarily breaks backward compatibility.
One would no longer be able to write
 
     a = @s c;
 
for a sequence 's'.  Yet, by replacing 'sequence_instance' with
'ps_sequence_identifier' in 'event_control', as suggested in Mantis on
7-11-2006, you could preserve this part of backward compatibility and
still address the easier-to-Yacc desire of the erratum.
 
       http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001532
 
-- Brad

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org] On
Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 11:19 AM
To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] #1532


Hi,
 
I have uploaded a proposal for #1532. 
 
Thanks.
Manisha