Hi, I think saying "do nothing" on property failure is same as not writing the property. So, effectively, user is wasting his/her time by saying do not report anything even if property fails. If the user really wants "do nothing" behaviour he/she should remove the property instead of writing null else clause. It is also error prone if use by mistake creates a null statement for else clause and thinks that property passed (because no failure was reported by the tool) whereas it actually did not. Thanks. Manisha ________________________________ From: Bassam Tabbara [mailto:Bassam.Tabbara@synopsys.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 7:59 PM To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; sv-ac@eda-stds.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] #1510 Hi Manisha, About your 2nd change in proposal, the null stmt form to me really means "do nothing", so the $error call treatment as if no else was specified bugs me. Thx. -Bassam. ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org] On Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 3:41 PM To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org Subject: [sv-ac] #1510 Hi, I have uploaded proposal for 1510. Thanks. ManishaReceived on Mon Jul 31 10:03:50 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 31 2006 - 10:04:02 PDT