RE: [sv-ac] #1510

From: Kulshrestha, Manisha <Manisha_Kulshrestha_at_.....>
Date: Mon Jul 31 2006 - 10:03:42 PDT
Hi,
 
I think saying "do nothing" on property failure is same as not writing
the property. So, effectively, user is wasting his/her time by saying do
not report anything even if property fails. If the user really wants "do
nothing" behaviour he/she should remove the property instead of writing
null else clause. It is also error prone if use by mistake creates a
null statement for else clause and thinks that property passed (because
no failure was reported by the tool) whereas it actually did not.
 
Thanks.
Manisha

________________________________

From: Bassam Tabbara [mailto:Bassam.Tabbara@synopsys.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 7:59 PM
To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] #1510


Hi Manisha,
 
About your 2nd change in proposal, the null stmt form to me really means
"do nothing", so the $error call treatment as if no else was specified
bugs me.
 
Thx.
-Bassam.
 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org] On
Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 3:41 PM
To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] #1510


Hi,
 
I have uploaded proposal for 1510. 
 
Thanks.
Manisha
Received on Mon Jul 31 10:03:50 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 31 2006 - 10:04:02 PDT