Re: [sv-ac] 928 Proposal Updated

I also vote yes on 928 and agree with Bassam on the friendly amendment.

I am worried that the phrase "type name" will suggest that only
declared type names can be used in these formal argument lists.

John H.

> X-Authentication-Warning: server.eda-stds.org: majordom set sender to owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org using -f
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:53:09 -0700
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] 928 Proposal Updated
> Thread-Index: AcaYfPvzxbMcHaPfT7ezSwGbXs/i0gAQHvIgAAPF0CAAHyYxoA==
> From: "Bassam Tabbara" <Bassam.Tabbara@synopsys.com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jun 2006 17:53:11.0049 (UTC) FILETIME=[63AB9790:01C69949]
> X-Virus-Status: Clean
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.eda-stds.org id k5QHrCDu009401
> Sender: owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> 
> I vote yes with a friendly ammendement to change all occurrences of
> "type name" to type -- we are declaring the *type* not a type name,
> better the way it was, the intent is clear.
> 
> Thx.
> -Bassam.
>