[sv-ac] Proposal for 1392 - Mantis is ready

Hi,
I added John's comment and have completed the mantis for 1392. 
Please comment if anything additional needs to be done before the voting
procedure.
Thanks 
Hillel


-----Original Message-----
From: John Havlicek [mailto:john.havlicek@freescale.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:00 PM
To: Miller Hillel-R53776
Cc: shalom.bresticker@intel.com; Miller Hillel-R53776;
sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ac] Proposal for 1392 - Clocking event syntax
corrections

Hillel:

I think that we should not use the word "clocking" in the second case.
For the second case, I think 

  "occurrence of the clocking event (posedge clk)" 

can be reduced to something like

  "occurrence of posedge clk" 

or

  "occurrence of the posedge clk event" 


J.H.

> X-Authentication-Warning: server.eda-stds.org: majordom set sender to 
> owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org using -f
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:47:18 +0300
> X-MS-Has-Attach: 
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
> Thread-Topic: [sv-ac] Proposal for 1392 - Clocking event syntax 
> corrections
> Thread-Index: 
> AcaE5AkE8zJjeeV9TOqUqJ7HgZ8yNANJNZ/QAJ4n1zAAAaRf8AAdwVRAAAHA+DA=
> From: "Miller Hillel-R53776" <r53776@freescale.com>
> Cc: "Miller Hillel-R53776" <r53776@freescale.com>, 
> <sv-ac@eda-stds.org>
> X-Virus-Status: Clean
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
> server.eda-stds.org id k5L7ldDu016105
> Sender: owner-sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jun 2006 07:51:21.0502 (UTC) 
> FILETIME=[7CA33BE0:01C69507]
> 
> Shalom,
> 
> In the LRM wording "clocking events" appear in two possible contexts:
> 
> 1) Reference to a piece of code with clocking event syntax.
> 
> 2) Discussion of the behavior that consists of clocking events.
> 
> To avoid confusion the sv-ac committee requested that these two have 
> different wordings.
> We decided that the first case would have the "clocking event 
> @(posedge clock)" wording and that the second case would have a 
> different wording, such as "occurrence of the clocking event (posedge 
> clk)".
> 
> The author needs to decide whether the latter is the correct wording 
> and then apply it consistently throughout the LRM.
> 
> Thanks
> Hillel
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:52 AM
> To: Miller Hillel-R53776; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Proposal for 1392 - Clocking event syntax 
> corrections
> 
> I think it is just "clocking events".
> 
> > The author needs to check what is the correct wording for 
> > "occurences
> of
> > clocking events". 
> 
> 
> Shalom
>