RE: [sv-ac] Proposal for 1392 - Clocking event syntax corrections

From: Miller Hillel-R53776 <r53776_at_.....>
Date: Wed Jun 21 2006 - 00:47:18 PDT
Shalom,

In the LRM wording "clocking events" appear in two possible contexts:

1) Reference to a piece of code with clocking event syntax.

2) Discussion of the behavior that consists of clocking events.

To avoid confusion the sv-ac committee requested that these two have
different wordings.
We decided that the first case would have the "clocking event @(posedge
clock)" wording and that the second case would have a different wording,
such as
"occurrence of the clocking event (posedge clk)". 

The author needs to decide whether the latter is the correct wording and
then apply it consistently throughout the LRM.

Thanks
Hillel


-----Original Message-----
From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:52 AM
To: Miller Hillel-R53776; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Proposal for 1392 - Clocking event syntax
corrections

I think it is just "clocking events".

> The author needs to check what is the correct wording for "occurences
of
> clocking events". 


Shalom
Received on Wed Jun 21 00:47:41 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 21 2006 - 00:47:53 PDT