RE: [sv-ac] Submitted proposal for resolution of 928 - Please comment

Manisha, Hillel's proposal is in the bugnotes (last one). Yes the
attached proposal will need to be updated with the final proposed
corrections (deletions/additions). 

Thx.
-Bassam.

--
Dr. Bassam Tabbara
Synopsys, Inc.
(650) 584-1973

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:34 PM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Submitted proposal for resolution of 928 - Please
comment

Hillel,

The item #928 still has the proposal to remove "list_of_formals". Is
that your proposal ? If not, Could you mention the mantis item which
contains your proposal ? If yes, then how do we pass event expressions ?

Thanks.
Manisha 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Miller Hillel-R53776
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 5:51 AM
To: Bassam Tabbara; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Submitted proposal for resolution of 928 - Please
comment




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Bassam Tabbara
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:18 PM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] #928

Hi all,

== last meeting minutes
3) #928: Passed by vote. Issue raised by John/Manisha in email, reopen ?

John motion to reopen, Joseph seconds. Item opened.
- Hillel to look over (original #196). 
==

$ is already covered in BNF since expression -> primary -> $

However the event_expression still seems missing.

Thx.
-Bassam.

--
Dr. Bassam Tabbara
Synopsys, Inc.
(650) 584-1973