Hi All, Here are the minutes, please send corrections if any. ** Please see the action items below particularly (1). ** John: I will take on #1325, noted below. Thx. -Bassam. ==== Minutes of IEEE P1800 SV-AC meeting #2006-4: 02/28/2006 Written by: Bassam Tabbara Code for the conference call: Domestic: 888-635-9997 International: 763-315-6815 Participant code: 2638198 Attendance Record Legend: x = attended - = missed r = represented . = not yet a member v = valid voter (3 out of last 4 or 75% overall) n = not valid voter n[xxx-] Faisal Haque (Cisco, Chairman) v[xxx-] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys - Co-chair) v[xxxx] John Havlicek (Freescale) v[xxxx] Doron Bustan (Freescale) v[xxxx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics) v[xxx-] Volkan Esen (Infineon) v[-xxx] Bassam Tabbara (Synopsys) v[-xxx] Hillel Miller (Freescale) v[-x--] Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys) v[-xxx] Jospeh Lu (Altera) [.x-x] Yaniv Fais (Freescale) [..xx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel) =====|---------------------------- 02/28/2006 Agenda: ------- - Review IEEE working group rules - Review errata reported in Mantis Minutes: -------- Ed out of town, Faisal out sick, Bassam chairing. Discussion on action items from meeting on 02/28/06: 1) #805: Manisha propsal ready for vote. Vote by email by Friday 3/3/06. 2) #1361: Disabling action block on vacuous or disabled success. - Manisha to update proposal with latest feedback by 3/14/06. - Dimitri to send email for discussion on semantics of cover property and what it means (likely separate issue). 3) #928: Passed by vote. Issue raised by John/Manisha in email, reopen ? John motion to reopen, Joseph seconds. Item opened. - Hillel to look over (original #196). 4) #966: Need update from Ed on discussion with SV-BC. 5) #1296: John update (discuss with Cindy), justification for changing semantics of non-overlapped implication not quite there yet, will take some time, should not rush. - Bassam: Change bug ID priority to low. 6) #921: this covers one of two aspects of this issue, the "when should tasks execute". John/Doron: get some realistic examples, what's good/bad/... about loose/tight approach. What do users expect ? Bassam: backward compatibility How is LRM interpreted currently ? John: Currently undefined. - All -- read actionWhen.pdf doc by 3/7/06, send feedback, discuss. - All -- get user input. 7) #1325: unnamed clocking blocks. - John (--Bassam) -- work with EC on this ... Send email to sv-ec, cc sv-ac. 8) #1326: No semantics for boolean_abbrev with sequence match item All agree we can restrict the BNF. - John -- write proposal strike sequence match item out of productions (for [->], and [=]) 9) #1346: Annex E index error in semantics of $past John: Typo, proposal up. All -- 3/3/06 send feedback, typo or not ? 10)#1347: forbid local variables in sampled value functions All agree we need to restrict - John start proposal, Hillel raised issue for passed (from outside) local vars -- All, proposal should disallow reference to a local variable (inside or passed in) ... 11) Bassam to check with Faisal/Ed on status of merge of 1364 and P1800 LRMs Action Items: ------------- 1) All - vote by email on #805 by 03/3/2006. All - send feedback typo or not for #1346 by 3/3/2006 2) All - provide additional feedback on #1361 action control tasks by 3/7/2006. Manisha post refined proposal by 03/14/2006. Dimitri - new thread on cover property semantics 3) #928 proposal by Hillel 4) #966 awaiting Ed update 5) #921: All to provide more feedback to Doron, discuss by email. 6) #1296: set priority to low, John to address when time permits. 7) #1325: John (--Bassam) to start thread with sv-ec, cc sv-ac. 8) #1326: John to send proposal for BNF production rewrite. 9) #1347: John to start proposal. 10) Faisal/Ed -- update on merge discussion of 1364 and P1800. Next meeting: 03/14/2006 at 9 am PT (12 pm ET, 6 pm Europe). ====Received on Tue Feb 28 10:46:23 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 28 2006 - 10:47:29 PST