RE: [sv-ac] Porposal assertion action control tasks

Hillel,

I did not understand your question ? Are you asking what is the default
behaviour of action blocks ? Basically all the action blocks work the
way they work now if no assertion action control task is specified. 

Manisha 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Miller Hillel-R53776
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:46 PM
To: Bassam Tabbara; sv-ac@eda.org
Cc: Miller Hillel-R53776
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Porposal assertion action control tasks

Manisha,
What is the default action, for the different action controls?
Thanks 


Hillel Miller>


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Bassam Tabbara
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:15 PM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Porposal assertion action control tasks

Hi Manisha,

2 comments:

1) The on/off should NOT affect currently running (in-flight)
assertions. Note that the asserton/off tasks do not, so we need to be
consistent + it makes sense to be this way.

2) Appropriate VPI control/callbacks will need to be added as well
(clause 28 see the on/off tasks and corresponding VPI for reference)
for:
- scope control/callbacks (note: no levels in current API ... applies to
whole scope, no need to extend this... Too fine grain) [for on/off this
is the SysOn/Off callbacks/control]
- assertion control/callbacks [for on/off this is the Enable/Disable
callbacks/control]

Note the handle can be a "vpiCollection" so lists are covered in API.

Thx.
-Bassam.

--
Dr. Bassam Tabbara
Synopsys, Inc.
(650) 584-1973

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:25 AM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Porposal assertion action control tasks

Hi All,

I am including a proposal for controlling action block execution. Please
send your feedback. Do we need another errata on this issue or this
proposal can be added to the errata on disable iff (which already has
another proposal).

Thanks.
Manisha