RE: [sv-ac] clocking blocks without identifiers

Also, it may not be needed in default clocking, correct?
ed
 


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Arturo Salz
	Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 3:42 PM
	To: john.havlicek@freescale.com; sv-ac@eda.org
	Subject: RE: [sv-ac] clocking blocks without identifiers
	
	

	John,

	 

	I seem to recall that the intent for unnamed clocking blocks was
to provide concurrent 

	assertions with a clock without necessarily having to name the
clocking, as in:

	 

	interface ifc( ... )

	    ...

	                clocking @(posedge clk);

	                    property P1; ... endpropery

	                    property P2; ... endproperty

	                endclocking

	            endintreface

	 

	In the example above, the clocking identifier is not needed.

	 

	            Arturo

	 

	-----Original Message-----
	From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf
Of John Havlicek
	Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 10:22 AM
	To: sv-ac@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ac] clocking blocks without identifiers

	 

	All:

	 

	A clocking block can be declared without a clocking_identifier.

	If there are items declared within such a block, how are they

	referenced?

	 

	I have skimmed Clause 15 and haven't found a definitive answer.

	 

	Best regards,

	 

	John H.