Hi All; For verilog users, the disable statement (from which the disable iff was modeled) discontinues execution of said block. Given this initial understanding, it would follow that the 'disable iff' statement would perform a similar operation for the covered properties. I have seen disable clauses used for reset sequences, thus given this and the above model, it would be consistent to allow the property to terminate without a success. If this solution is chosen, is it not possible for a property to be transformed by removal of the disable clause and adding the expression to the consequent of the property to obtain the other solution proposed - success due to a disable expressions returning true? Thanks. -- Adam Krolnik ZSP Verification Mgr. LSI Logic Corp. Plano TX. 75074 Co-author "Assertion-Based Design"Received on Mon Jan 30 09:14:19 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 30 2006 - 09:14:40 PST