RE: [sv-ac] Re: [sv-bc] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800

From: Eduard Cerny <Eduard.Cerny_at_.....>
Date: Sat Jan 28 2006 - 18:49:10 PST
Absolutely. But a confusing set of specs does not make a good
implementation.
Also, it is a question who does what. Usually the two are different
people. 
ed


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Brad Pierce
	Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 4:52 PM
	To: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ac@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ac] Re: [sv-bc] Opinion on merging of P1364 and
P1800
	
	

	It's a question of priorities, opportunity cost, return on
investment, and resource constraints.

	 

	Personally, I plan to invest my workdays in helping take tools,
flows, and methodologies to the next level.  Our users demonstrate an
intense results orientation and demand the same from us.  I can't tell
them, "Sorry, we'd love to support that optimization in the next
release, but we'll be merging the LRMs instead."

	 

	-- Brad   
Received on Sat Jan 28 18:49:17 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 28 2006 - 18:51:24 PST