RE: [sv-ac] FW: Updated SVDB and status please

From: Eduard Cerny <Eduard.Cerny_at_.....>
Date: Tue May 10 2005 - 10:42:41 PDT
Thank you.
ed 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Bassam Tabbara
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 1:33 PM
> To: sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] FW: Updated SVDB and status please
> 
>  
> Ed, I agree with all your statements below, my official vote:
> 
> issue     Accept   Reject
> 626		X
> 670		X
> 
> Thx.
> -Bassam.
> 
> --
> Dr. Bassam Tabbara
> Architect, R&D
> Novas Software Inc.
> (408) 467-7893
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Eduard Cerny
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 9:16 AM
> To: sv-ac@eda.org
> Cc: 'Ed Cerny'; Surrendra.Dudani@synopsys.com; 'Faisal Haque 
> (fhaque)';
> 'Karen Pieper'
> Subject: [sv-ac] FW: Updated SVDB and status please
> 
>  
> Hello,
> 
> It appears that SV-AC issues #626 and #670 in the Mantis database need
> to be voted on. 
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view_all_bug_page.php
> Both issues have proposals attached in the DB. I think that 
> we  can vote
> by email. Please do so today:
> 
> issue     Accept   Reject
> 626
> 670
> 
> 
> Issue #380 should be closed as no object methods are listed in BNF or
> among keywords. Let me know if you disagree.
> 
> 
> Issues #228, #664 and #665 need an editorial correction (as far as I
> could tell), so I assigned it to Stu. Let me know if you think that it
> needs more discussion. 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> ed
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tue May 10 10:42:48 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 10 2005 - 10:42:52 PDT