Yes to all
Doron
Arif Samad wrote:
>Friends:
>
>131, 136, 137 have annotation on them saying that no action is needed but
>SV-AC did not formally vote to close them. Similarly, 155 says the word
>"check" should be removed from the index. Since Ed has pointed out that
>the index will be regenerated anyway no action is needed here also.
>
>In order to follow P1800 procedure, Karen Pieper has suggested that we
>formally vote to close these items.
>
>Please vote on the following question:
>
>Should we close items 131, 136, 137 and 155 with no action?
>
>Please send your vote to the reflector asap but no later than 12/10.
>
>Happy holidays!
>
>Regards,
>
>Arif
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Dec 6 06:40:44 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 06 2004 - 06:40:50 PST